Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:50:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USES vs BUILD_DEPENDS Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1503300843030.18384@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1503291311320.14789@sea.ntplx.net> References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1503291236300.14490@sea.ntplx.net> <20150329165301.GA91058@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1503291311320.14789@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:41:21PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>> I have a port which needs pod2man just to build the man file >>> during installation. Why do I need USES= pod2man:perl5 just to >>> build the port? It doesn't seem feasible to use BUILD_DEPENDS >>> because there is no generic perl5 port. >>> >> Have you tried using pod2mdoc ? > > No, I didn't know about it, I will check it out. I searched other > ports (grep) and found pod2man used. My port's (internal) > doc/Makefile uses pod2man. pod2mdoc doesn't seem compatible with the way pod2man is used: pod2man --release="`cat .version`" --center="Foo" $*.pod in particular, the -r or --release option. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.1503300843030.18384>