Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:38:40 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@TheWorld.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel option USER_LDT issues in -stable Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020122163448.13337A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <200201222110.QAA9516725@shell.TheWorld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: > Hello, > > Are there any issues (security, reliablity, performance, etc.) > with regard to the USER_LDT kernel option in -stable? Since > this appears to be defined by default in -current, why is this > not the case with -stable? I can see it being required in -current soon as threadsNG is going to need it. I don't see the harm in making it default in -stable, but I can't address any security concerns (if there are any). -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1020122163448.13337A-100000>