Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 15:29:15 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha interrupt.c Message-ID: <XFMail.011001152915.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200110012226.f91MQmm44174@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01-Oct-01 John Baldwin wrote: > jhb 2001/10/01 15:26:48 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/alpha/alpha interrupt.c > Log: > Sigh, statclock_process() takes a KSE instead of a thread for its first > argument. Grrr, why does statclock_process() take a KSE, and hardclock_process() take a thread? Is consistency too much to ask? Also, the panic message in the KASSERT() in statclock_process() (td != curthread) implies that statclock_proceess() takes a thread. The panic message should be 'ke != curkse' instead if it stays using kse's. Personally, I think *clock_process() should both take threads and should be renamed *clock_thread(). -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011001152915.jhb>