Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:39:03 -0800 (PST)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.ORG>, Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr>, Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>, Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
Subject:   Re: Committer's guide policy on commit message contents
Message-ID:  <XFMail.011129083903.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200111291552.fATFqaZ60469@green.bikeshed.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 29-Nov-01 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 12:33:09PM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote:
>> > > I suggest we choose the British variants then.  Does that seem like a
>> > > silly thing to say?  Indeed it does.
>> > 
>> > Yay!
>> 
>> Before I started actively submitting to the FAQ and Handbook, I sat
>> down and read them both.  The random whiplash between British and US
>> spellings is actively painful to anyone with any literary sensibility.
>> It's painful enough that, as a native American speaker, I don't care
>> if the docs are in British.  I don't care if some entire docs are in
>> British and some entire docs are in American -- it would be simple
>> enough to add a custom DocBook tag to the opening of each document to
>> say, i.e., <language_variant="british">.  I don't care if the docs all
>> follow Mark Twain's famous "how to simplify English spelling" essay.
>> Just pick something, pick anything, and stick to it in each individual
>> document.
>> 
>> The British spellings would present a certain level of, shall we say,
>> "class."  Our docproj lead is from Britain.  And an ispell dictionary
>> is available.  I don't see any reason why not.
>> 
>> (Of course, this has been a contentious issue for years, and I don't
>> expect it to actually change.)
> 
> I just want to know: does this mean I'll get to spell "connection" with an 
> "x" :)?  Seriously, though, I would vote that all documentation spelling
> that's 
> actually in the en_US sections should really be in American English, and I 
> would prefer American English for the simple reason that it is what BSD 
> documentation has been written in historically.  Note that I do not intend 
> to actually "vote" on this, of course.

Yes, and we can have en_GB (or en_BR or whatever it's called) if we wish to
have the British version as well.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011129083903.jhb>