Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 11:41:04 +0000 From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Cc: "rmacklem@freebsd.org" <rmacklem@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Can't NFS mount ZFS volume Message-ID: <YQXPR0101MB099735243416AA31BAD2BFB5DD7C0@YQXPR0101MB0997.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> In-Reply-To: <65feb444-3265-b9bc-3d4d-d57b125513d3@protected-networks.net> References: <4cbb6150-0fcc-5393-846f-309e19cfb0ea@protected-networks.net> <YQXPR0101MB0997D0BB798ADFE4283E2635DD7F0@YQXPR0101MB0997.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>, <65feb444-3265-b9bc-3d4d-d57b125513d3@protected-networks.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Butler wrote:
> I have no idea why but using ..
>
> sudo /sbin/mount vm01:/usr/local/exports/ /mnt
This is weird. I would have thought they would both result in the same
behaviour.
> .. instead of ..
>
> sudo /sbin/mount -t nfs vm01:/usr/local/exports/ /mnt
Did this work with the older system?.
I'll admit I always go "su" and then do the mount command as
# mount -t nfs vm01:/usr/local/exports /mnt"
Please let us know if this doesn't work.
(If you try this and it doesn't work, then something is definitely broken.)
I don't even have sudo. (It's a port and my guess would be some issue
related to how either it or "mount" parses things.)
rick
=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YQXPR0101MB099735243416AA31BAD2BFB5DD7C0>