Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:58:03 +0200 From: Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/144357: emulators/wine build failure Message-ID: <a0777e081003072358l238e7161qb866616171ed9d3e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.99.1003072351140.385@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <201002281924.o1SJO6df078229@freefall.freebsd.org> <a0777e081002281529i3e2cce74t7488a8f4bf28b305@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.1.99.1003072351140.385@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> Which version of flex are you using (you can find out running >>> /usr/local/bin/flex --version)? >> %flex --version >> flex version 2.5.4 > > that is the system version of flex; I was specifically asking for > the one in /usr/local/bin/flex which is used by the wine port (since > the system one is too old for wine). Interesting - I just used whatever flex was in my path. Is wine making the same mistake? % /usr/local/bin/flex --version flex 2.5.35 > It should not, but if you can rebuild flex and Wine without this, that > would be an interesting data point. > My take it this is that _something_ is causing flex to generate incorrect > code or the toolchain is miscompiling something. =A0That's why I asked ab= out > the version of flex you are using, that is the one thing I could think of= . > (Over here it is flex 2.5.35, the package 2.5.35_3.) Same here: flex-2.5.35_3 > > Gerald >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a0777e081003072358l238e7161qb866616171ed9d3e>