Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 12:34:37 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> To: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org> Cc: vermaden <vermaden@interia.pl>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Building VM-IMAGE(s) from Source Message-ID: <aeC7PdYb_k0fDpm0@fc.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <EB00558E-C5E5-4252-BAE0-0F4353F6C85C@FreeBSD.org> References: <vsrnpptctovresbxatrz@hovo> <mvypbzderggweublxtzg@ysah> <EB00558E-C5E5-4252-BAE0-0F4353F6C85C@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi!
> For every other use case, `poudriere image` is a far more flexible tool (does custom builds, can do base-system overlays, install packages, build packages from ports-tree overlays, and so on), so why would you write a tool that does a small subset of what it does?
The man page poudriere-image(8) (of 3.4.7) says:
WARNING: This feature is still considered ALPHA.
--
pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aeC7PdYb_k0fDpm0>