Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 10:20:19 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Thomas Hoffmann <trh411@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, daniel dallmann <djdallmann@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Processes and Daemons Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1403021012540.15399@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <CAB7-odn0QkW3Beqx4Xj6m1yeWCqCtYjWQY2ZVq_wZ7TnOWwGcA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALGz73gxqgyv8KXOom0PUC9-F76cFX9H4bsq-jj%2BwaG2VqShig@mail.gmail.com> <CAB7-odn0QkW3Beqx4Xj6m1yeWCqCtYjWQY2ZVq_wZ7TnOWwGcA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Thomas Hoffmann wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:10 PM, daniel dallmann <djdallmann@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I was wondering if the output from top was displayed with two headers on >> purpose? >> >> http://www.za.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/basics-processes.html > > > I'm guessing yes. The first is without ZFS stats (5 lines), the second with > ZFS stats (6 lines). The text describes the 'top' heading as being 5 or 6 > lines. So these two header formats are the two users will encounter, > depending on their use or non-use of ZFS. If intentional, it's a bit misleading. Better to show just one more realistically and note that the output will vary depending on the individual system. It does not seem necessary mention ZFS specifically.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1403021012540.15399>