Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:06:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Daniel Bolgheroni <me@dbolgheroni.eng.br> To: Holger Kipp <hk@alogis.com> Cc: Michal <michal@sharescope.co.uk>, misc@openbsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD Message-ID: <alpine.BSO.2.00.0906230151390.16790@mobile.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <20090619095832.GA58127@intserv.int1.b.intern> References: <735E59909DEB44AF92825EA7C65CF430@ionicoffice.ionic.co.uk> <20090619095832.GA58127@intserv.int1.b.intern>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Holger Kipp wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote: > > For the masses: > > - NetBSD: Run on any hardware (including toasters) > - OpenBSD: Be as secure as possible > - FreeBSD: provide best system for x86-platforms It's a mistake to make this association. OpenBSD people chose "security" as an argument to describe what the OS is. It's true and I believe it can attract more users, but on the other side, people seem to think OpenBSD is ONLY used when you need security, like a firewall, router, etc. OpenBSD is a GENERIC OS which can be used to do _almost_ every task a computer system is able to. Teers, -- Daniel Bolgheroni <me@dbolgheroni.eng.br> FEI - Faculdade de Engenharia Industrial http://www.dbolgheroni.eng.br/mykey ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) against HTML e-mail X / \
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSO.2.00.0906230151390.16790>