Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Dec 2013 12:08:54 +0100 (CET)
From:      Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To:        William Grzybowski <william88@gmail.com>
Cc:        python@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: python packages struggling with GCC 4.7
Message-ID:  <alpine.LNX.2.00.1312051208100.2185@tuna.site>
In-Reply-To: <CAHtVNLO0c9aBnL7tDkXO4XTVzDy1DuVVEDJwRjAbj4oEfDf-ng@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201311060508.rA658XmR012155@svn.freebsd.org> <20131106063906.GA1385@medusa.sysfault.org> <20131106070255.GE60770@FreeBSD.org> <CAHtVNLMxUbFTS1J%2Bh1GQv_nEW84NE1t4FdDy8Sinkn2FKr8i_w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1312040220450.2185@tuna.site> <CAHtVNLMVRgO7xrGCqad-MOPCzojXTAXJE16uTaKOULd4ZLf_BQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1312041405490.2185@tuna.site> <CAHtVNLO0c9aBnL7tDkXO4XTVzDy1DuVVEDJwRjAbj4oEfDf-ng@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, William Grzybowski wrote:
> It looks like the build is not respecting FFLAGS, so no -Wl,rpath= for 
> gfortran. As far as it working for gcc46, it looks like it fails to 
> detect gfortran46 as a compiler and uses gcc46, which respects CFLAGS.

That is, hmm, interesting. =:-)  Nice analysis.

> Can you try http://people.freebsd.org/~wg/py-numpy.patch  ?

Thanks for the patch!  

Is there any chance that someone on python@ can give it a try?  That 
would be great since I am traveling right now and hardly can test.

Gerald



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1312051208100.2185>