Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:45:42 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Rebecca Cran <bcran@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: GPT boot has less features than legacy MBR-based one (Was: UEFI, loader.efi and /boot.config) Message-ID: <b4100160-d30d-a696-a2cb-be4f7f0d5305@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <DE6A295D-80CF-4E9A-88EE-F9F63ED66286@me.com> References: <912985968.20190119125228@serebryakov.spb.ru> <etPan.5c433dd9.327b23c6.1973@bluestop.org> <1951151017.20190119235425@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4636753.YNO7O01DYZ@photon.int.bluestop.org> <17710465740.20190120134042@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CANCZdfq%2BmuSr=CX4V9_ebWwNv1S49=mJZms0ZVoCB2onp%2BqHNA@mail.gmail.com> <3f4214e2-36af-cc87-0a3c-2c7ce26cffd8@FreeBSD.org> <DE6A295D-80CF-4E9A-88EE-F9F63ED66286@me.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --VtS3gdhEwP7P5wKp0cFsxXjW5JKqAN75I Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="DxuDO7cEoCACubj2JgWZI58QcIMvhyWLM"; protected-headers="v1" From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org To: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Rebecca Cran <bcran@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <b4100160-d30d-a696-a2cb-be4f7f0d5305@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: GPT boot has less features than legacy MBR-based one (Was: UEFI, loader.efi and /boot.config) References: <912985968.20190119125228@serebryakov.spb.ru> <etPan.5c433dd9.327b23c6.1973@bluestop.org> <1951151017.20190119235425@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4636753.YNO7O01DYZ@photon.int.bluestop.org> <17710465740.20190120134042@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CANCZdfq+muSr=CX4V9_ebWwNv1S49=mJZms0ZVoCB2onp+qHNA@mail.gmail.com> <3f4214e2-36af-cc87-0a3c-2c7ce26cffd8@FreeBSD.org> <DE6A295D-80CF-4E9A-88EE-F9F63ED66286@me.com> In-Reply-To: <DE6A295D-80CF-4E9A-88EE-F9F63ED66286@me.com> --DxuDO7cEoCACubj2JgWZI58QcIMvhyWLM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21.01.2019 15:39, Toomas Soome wrote: >>> Is too complicated? Boot1.efi doesn't allow that, but loader.efi does= =2E >> loader.efi lives on ESP partition, do I understand it right? So, it >> could not be damaged with "bad" upgrade? >=20 > It could, unless the backup is created.=20 Does it live on code (root) FS or ESP? I understand, that when you upgrade ESP partition, you could ruin it, but typically root FS is upgraded much more often than ESP/boot0/boot1 parts. --=20 // Lev Serebryakov --DxuDO7cEoCACubj2JgWZI58QcIMvhyWLM-- --VtS3gdhEwP7P5wKp0cFsxXjW5JKqAN75I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE+W0coLX0MYtnSzMK6rA8WL/cR48FAlxFvvZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEY5 NkQxQ0EwQjVGNDMxOEI2NzRCMzMwQUVBQjAzQzU4QkZEQzQ3OEYACgkQ6rA8WL/c R49RyBAA2Aeesq/S3uzG70BwUq3SSczu++56YiNbauLRdTV5zBD9gQOVFyWAMmbZ FcSwsPZpG0Lqv4IiFTTwa0x741JeNhcf8+w+3OUvq9HSDUGJ3nB6BanSVmHYcCG2 2ATyrPKf4trn9xsfhPg3ikJTrUtMLW3bOtxJxO2sqqEeZFOBhWEDhUmqqTg4VndC 3FAUGwTmL9DzZLGATN5ZTVUV0xBvrPNV0/5Sflzdhk16cAdD2pEwuLXcOCCq7faL VzRaDmnomamO0NKk2/zD2A30rT9gRmiVbElnPc7zRi2BXhUflx75tLMLtvzUnbVU 76qyPWdU963JRWmZnsjG5JoibcLOLpG65sf/WsHgtScxE+C2dNltfG6hvWDnCn2G wugZsgeV7ExMNZGmkkCK857MnC9wPzHfujFByZchDEiPWO92BINav/Nyl2GYq6Q6 x4L6fT0cv3CI1xf4ZI2FSgAFbEfM0oTo97cSZXtgqSbqGMkLz2jeA3QO2qXiZgm8 swS2APxRBwCJVD7BZ6Xrx2c58czPihCTVMmMP1v9TP9FRWp5C0uoOtvGJwUnEu0X A6QrayC/o61byOXn6rB2HmHxQrde78Bokmn2hM03qPWRqO66S3nNWIWGVIXXsIXu e1+6dJ/7wnluyRw9F/kVhYmkGbtWOcE4RHXq/Q/om3HE25wAv5M= =O1ea -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VtS3gdhEwP7P5wKp0cFsxXjW5JKqAN75I--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b4100160-d30d-a696-a2cb-be4f7f0d5305>