Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 21:30:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239630] x11/libxshmfence: prefer SHM_ANON over mksotemp() Message-ID: <bug-239630-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239630 Bug ID: 239630 Summary: x11/libxshmfence: prefer SHM_ANON over mksotemp() Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Keywords: patch Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: x11@FreeBSD.org Reporter: jbeich@FreeBSD.org CC: x11@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(x11@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: x11@FreeBSD.org Attachment #206257 maintainer-approval?(x11@FreeBSD.org) Flags: CC: x11@FreeBSD.org Created attachment 206257 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=206257&action=edit v1 (has commit message) SHM_ANON is faster and more similar to memfd_create(). Not bothering to upstream because futex/mksotemp fixes didn't get any feedback after 2 years. Patchwork is complete crap for one-off contributors i.e., those humble enough to not annoy everyone on patch maillist why their contribution wasn't reviewed yet. libxshmfence is only used by DRI3, so make sure to define LIBGL_DRI3_ENABLE via environ(7) due to drm-legacy-kmod hacks in mesa-dri and if using xf86-video-intel add Option "DRI" "3" to xorg.conf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239630-7141>