Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 21:31:29 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243094] reboot problem Message-ID: <bug-243094-227-j5Kb4fz3jk@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-243094-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-243094-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243094 --- Comment #8 from Bernhard Berger <bernhard@blberger.de> --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #7) I'll give you an example: If it says "bread" on the package, then any reasonable person would assume = that there is bread inside. This is also the case with the "reboot" program, so even if called without parameters, the "reboot" function should be executed in a system-compliant manner, and that includes executing /etc/rc.shutdown. But it's not the error that upsets me, it's that you don't even try to fix = it. I am very outraged by this.=20 Maybe it wasn't so serious "before" and therefore not noticeable. But with = the arrival of bhyve, it takes on a whole new meaning. Therefore, the program reboot should definitely be revised and adapted to the new requirements (th= is has obviously been missed).=20 Since it is not part of the Posix standard, you can also move it into the p= orts and remove it from the ports with notice.=20=20=20=20 There are solutions, you just have to want it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243094-227-j5Kb4fz3jk>