Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:45:00 +0800 From: "Jiawei Ye" <leafy7382@gmail.com> To: "Roman Divacky" <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler? Message-ID: <c21e92e20901090045v271c33e1t39d8f69b849c3324@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090109083404.GB55615@freebsd.org> References: <49668763.8020705@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20090108233311.GA69883@keltia.freenix.fr> <20090109083404.GB55615@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> wrote: > I am working a little on clang/llvm and I also looked at pcc, it's not > there yet to be able to compile world/kernel but it's progressing well... > > > there are two major features missing from clang (designated initializers > and wchars) that prevents it from compiling world/kernel, and of course > bugs :) but I am periodically checking how it performs and I post thebugs > to the llvm/clang team... > > I believe we'll have it one day :) > > roman What about llvm-gcc4? This has more compatibility with gcc than clang. Jiawei -- "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then to the end user it's a duck, and end users have made it pretty clear they want a duck; whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c21e92e20901090045v271c33e1t39d8f69b849c3324>