Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 May 2007 17:32:37 +0400
From:      "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "=?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=" <des@des.no>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2
Message-ID:  <cb5206420705240632j2d12d5dcn5e3fd7c2ee676ff5@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <86wsyy8kv7.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References:  <46543647.7010202@gmail.com> <cb5206420705230636j4e485163q9c53f5157a8f45dd@mail.gmail.com> <20070524083619.GZ93167@graf.pompo.net> <868xbe9zxf.fsf@dwp.des.no> <cb5206420705240527h2cc0fad7v68f76c9fa4ff3110@mail.gmail.com> <86wsyy8kv7.fsf@dwp.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
> "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
> > > Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > > My card is a X700Super (commercial name), detected as <ATI Radeon
> > > > RV410 X700 SE>: it's a rather cheap card, and I'm not sure that it
> > > > is > 9500.
> > > It is, the 9500 belongs to the R300 series while the X700 is an
> > > R400-series chip.
> > Depends on how you define ">", of course :-)
>
> "later generation"
>
> The issue is that the R300 has been supported for a long time, while
> until recently the R400 was not.

Yes, I'm lucky to have 9550 and 1100 - both of which are
not supported by any version of Xorg :-(


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420705240632j2d12d5dcn5e3fd7c2ee676ff5>