Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:32:37 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "=?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=" <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2 Message-ID: <cb5206420705240632j2d12d5dcn5e3fd7c2ee676ff5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86wsyy8kv7.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <46543647.7010202@gmail.com> <cb5206420705230636j4e485163q9c53f5157a8f45dd@mail.gmail.com> <20070524083619.GZ93167@graf.pompo.net> <868xbe9zxf.fsf@dwp.des.no> <cb5206420705240527h2cc0fad7v68f76c9fa4ff3110@mail.gmail.com> <86wsyy8kv7.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > > > Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > > My card is a X700Super (commercial name), detected as <ATI Radeon > > > > RV410 X700 SE>: it's a rather cheap card, and I'm not sure that it > > > > is > 9500. > > > It is, the 9500 belongs to the R300 series while the X700 is an > > > R400-series chip. > > Depends on how you define ">", of course :-) > > "later generation" > > The issue is that the R300 has been supported for a long time, while > until recently the R400 was not. Yes, I'm lucky to have 9550 and 1100 - both of which are not supported by any version of Xorg :-(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420705240632j2d12d5dcn5e3fd7c2ee676ff5>
