Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:11:31 -0400 From: Scott Ullrich <sullrich@gmail.com> To: Sascha Luck <lists@c4inet.net> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pfsync / 6-CURRENT-amd64 Message-ID: <d5992baf0506251911521c172b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050626020825.GA45376@saoirse.c4inet.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 6/25/05, Sascha Luck <lists@c4inet.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I've built a redundant firewall setup with pf / CARP / pfsync on > CURRENT. pf and CARP are working well, the traffic fails over > without problems. > pfsyc, however, seems not to work at all. There is no traffic on > the sync interface, the states are (obviously) not being synced. > > The NICs are all Intel 1000MT dual-port cards (btw, I can confirm > that fail-over on VLAN interfaces on em NICs does work on CURRENT) > > CURRENT kernel versions: > FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Jun 26 02:10:42 IST 2005 > > pf, pflog and pfsync are built into the kernel. both pfsync > interfaces are up and connected to the syncif, they are connected > by xover cable: > > cwi010# ifconfig pfsync0 > pfsync0: flags=41<UP,RUNNING> mtu 1348 > pfsync: syncdev: em5 maxupd: 128 > > em5: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > options=4b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,POLLING> > inet 10.10.255.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.10.255.255 > inet6 fe80::211:43ff:fee5:8377%em5 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 > ether 00:11:43:e5:83:77 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>) > status: active > > Has anyone seen similar effects? Is this connected to the network > interface changes as of Jun 9? For what it's worth we are also seeing this same problem on pfSense with from what I can tell is all NICS. Let me know if you need any more information. It seems to have broken around the 10th. Regards, Scotthome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d5992baf0506251911521c172b>