Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:17:41 +0000 (GMT) From: ejcerejo@optonline.net To: Chris Hill <chris@monochrome.org> Cc: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by "evolution" Message-ID: <e93cf0e514a.47afb045@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <20080210184728.H23285@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <47ADE033.7070402@optonline.net> <47ADE2EC.2030906@infracaninophile.co.uk> <47ADEAD2.2030803@bsdforen.de> <200802092346.23078.ejcerejo@optonline.net> <47AEF9B5.10509@onetel.com> <20080210084035.551b9acf@scorpio> <47AF16F8.3040109@optonline.net> <20080210122358.4dc52efd@scorpio> <47AF389E.2010909@optonline.net> <47AF3B98.7060901@bsdforen.de> <47AF8B22.2010903@optonline.net> <20080210184728.H23285@tripel.monochrome.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
----- Original Message -----From: Chris Hill Date: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:51 pmSubject: Re: libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by "evolution"To: "E. J. Cerejo" Cc: Dominic Fandrey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, E. J. Cerejo wrote:> > > Dominic Fandrey wrote:> >> E. J. Cerejo wrote:> >>> Gerard wrote:> >>>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500> >>>> "E. J. Cerejo" wrote:> >>>> > >>>> [snip]> >>>> > >>>>> Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?> >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Yes, I use it all the time.> >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> Why has the ports tree be up to date?> >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> What conceivable reason would you have for using an > outdated ports tree?> >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> Will portmanager download anything from the cvsup repos?> >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> It will only fetch programs that need updating, just like > portupgrade.>>>> > >>>> Would you be so kind as to explain your reluctance to > update your> >>>> system? The number of potential programs that need updating seems> >>>> rather immaterial when compared to the potential system wide> >>>> improvement in its overall performance. You could simply > start the> >>>> upgrade in the evening when you are through using the PC. > Depending on> >>>> the speed of your machine, it might very well be done by > the next> >>>> morning, if not sooner.> >>>> > >>> My system was updated yesterday and I'm trying to resolve > the issues that > >>> arose from the updating. I can't update my system everyday > I just don't > >>> have time for it.> >> > >> If you don't want to rebuild the stuff, just add> >> > >> libicui18n.so.36 libicui18n.so> >> > >> to your /etc/libmap.conf file. This solution works if no > functions have > >> been removed from the library interface, which only very > rarely happens.> >> _______________________________________________> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>; >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"> >> > >> > I just ran pkg_libchk -m piped to a file but looks pretty > confusing, is there > > a way to get only the output for the lines containing > > /usr/local/lib/libicui18n.so.38?> > Umm... why not> $ grep libicui18n.so.38 filename> ...or pipe your output through grep in the first place, e.g.> pkg_libchk -m | grep libicui18n.so.38> > Not for nothing do they call me 'master of the obvious'.> > --> Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org> ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ]> Yes I do know how to do that but what I really wanted is how to send the output directly into a file and not to the terminal. I used the > [filename] next to the above command but I get the file without the grep effect, another words I get everything as if I ran just pkg_libchk -m with the grep option.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e93cf0e514a.47afb045>