Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:24:22 -0300 (BRT) From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" <matheus@eternamente.info> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox - no screen refresh Message-ID: <ec19106c7e9bd7d5bf65942aee031827.squirrel@10.1.1.10> In-Reply-To: <e261179f0907241151g3a188420y59ea892a2c22028@mail.gmail.com> References: <1247175832.1455.36.camel@zero.mshome.net> <1247602161.2105.14.camel@localhost> <301c9e6c36d74e0c66ee5731638691d1.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> <1247658678.5135.6.camel@localhost> <1248092972.1756.7.camel@localhost> <90e3c9587dbba03b2b7d253fa26adca1.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <e261179f0907201029t47842110h6ca2eb09875e5230@mail.gmail.com> <1248112074.1756.39.camel@localhost> <0eef4f4e9462e4fc86429b96ee215a37.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <e261179f0907201454v7345585ftd2bb020a33c9066c@mail.gmail.com> <e261179f0907241151g3a188420y59ea892a2c22028@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, July 24, 2009 15:51, Boris wrote: > I built the world and recompiled with revision 430 and I can start 32-bit > VM > without VT-x selected. I do not have a system crash anymore. > > I still cannot start 32-bit nor 64-bit VM while VT-x is checked. I got an > error message. I have read it's not supported and the opposite throughout > different threads. > > Can anybody confirm what is really supported at the moment? as I'm not a dev from this project, I can say what I tested and was ok :) > - 32-bit VM without VT-x ? OK for me OK > - 32-bit VM with VT-x? > - 64-bit VM with VT-x ? OK for some things using 7.2-STABLE and rev 428. what's the major diff from 428 and 430 ? thanks, matheus > Thanks, > > Boris > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Boris <borisbsd@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> No luck for me. I have recompiled my kernel with the latest from CVS (I >> noticed the pmap.c version 1.665 previous I used was 1.664). >> I recompiled virtualbox rev427 as well. >> >> VirtualBox starts but whenever I launch a VM the system crashes just >> after >> hitting the start button, with and without VT-x enabled. >> >> Worse thing is the memory dump does not complete so I have got no trace >> to >> analyse. >> >> Vladimir, >> >> Could you confirm a few things for me please? >> >> - did you upgrade from 7.2 to 8-CURRENT? or did you do a fresh install >> from >> snapshot? >> >> - I am using a customer kernel, I noticed you do it as well. Could you >> post >> a diff -ruN GENERIC VBOOK for me please? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Boris >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos >> <matheus@eternamente.info>wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, July 20, 2009 14:47, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: >>> > Hi >>> > >>> >> I got Revision 427 compiled on amd64 unfortunately it crashes at the >>> >> time of >>> >> launching any VM. I have provided some details to Beat and pointed >>> at >>> >> this >>> >> thread as the issue looked similar to Vladimir's one when reading >>> the >>> >> core.txt file produced after the system crash. >>> > >>> > It does not crash any more with very recent kernel. >>> > So, probably you may do another try. >>> >>> I have here: >>> $ uname -a >>> FreeBSD xxx 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 17 15:30:47 BRT >>> 2009 >>> root@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx amd64 >>> >>> and got to boot debian 5 amd64 cd and right now I'm quite at the end of >>> the install. this is just possible using just one cpu. when tried using >>> two cpu's, somewhere before disk selection it dies. >>> >>> my goal is to run a linux amd64 with as much cores I can (goal is all >>> 4) >>> running folding at home (cpu intense app). >>> >>> I read about 3.0 lets us use VT-x and run multicore ok, anyone tested >>> this >>> ? >>> >>> thanks and great work on vbox and freebsd !! the port compiles fine in >>> here. I just recompiled vbox. would be a good idea to recompile all ? >>> >>> matheus >>> >>> > Only issue I have - no screen refresh, and it kills whole thing for >>> me. >>> > >>> >> Let's see what comes back from Beat and the folks porting the port >>> to >>> >> FreeBSD. >>> >> >>> >> Boris >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Vladimir B. Grebenschikov >>> > vova@fbsd.ru >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> We will call you cygnus, >>> The God of balance you shall be >>> >>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ec19106c7e9bd7d5bf65942aee031827.squirrel>