Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:18:47 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com> To: Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flash Message-ID: <ef60af0904102423184c444813@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0800C9A6-264C-11D9-BB05-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> References: <ef60af0904102221565dbbd530@mail.gmail.com> <417A69B2.1070007@sydnet.net> <ef60af09041023111634bd0187@mail.gmail.com> <ef60af090410231220a688c5a@mail.gmail.com> <ef60af0904102423021787c31b@mail.gmail.com> <0800C9A6-264C-11D9-BB05-000A958C81C6@ahze.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
And which one do you recommend ? On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:06:37 -0400, Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net> wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2004, at 2:02 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > Can somebody tell me the difference between > > > > /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-firefox > > Uses graphics/libflash (which is a GPL) > > > and > > > > /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > > Uses www/linux-flashplugin6 from macromedia > > Michael > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef60af0904102423184c444813>