Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:41:30 +0100 From: Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: c++ Message-ID: <ef60af0905021923411a0272b6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <675354920.20050220001731@wanadoo.fr> References: <ef60af09050219015116024f83@mail.gmail.com> <5b8472dd5925a0b0b59f15cd9f8e15f3@shire.net> <ef60af0905021915074e5d2929@mail.gmail.com> <675354920.20050220001731@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:17:31 +0100, Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > A=*data > > The contents of the memory location pointed to by data is copied to A. > > > A=data > > The value of data is copied to A. > > > A=&data > > The address in memory of data is copied to A. > > -- > Anthony > So if data is declared as a gchar *data; for example, then the value of data is a memory adress right ? So if A=data; and B=&data; then A and B are exactly the same result right ? Now why would anybody want a gchar when a integer is needed ? That is just making it more complicated then it already is?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef60af0905021923411a0272b6>