Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:43:54 +0000 From: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any suggestions for a layer 3 load ablancer for 12, as relayd doesnt work anymore Message-ID: <f276b83a-e57b-a9f5-9186-e2b5116f9962@ingresso.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <3CD6B22B-B35C-4B9C-BDBA-D2E928435F91@exonetric.com> References: <E1gj4tQ-000MGi-0H@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> <1547491459.1113392.1634330440.3BE6B9CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> <3CD6B22B-B35C-4B9C-BDBA-D2E928435F91@exonetric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15/01/2019 10:24, Mark Blackman wrote: >> On 14 Jan 2019, at 18:44, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@skunkwerks.at> wrote: >> haproxy does proper failover and allows custom health checks either via >> URL or real world traffic of external scripts. Traefik has lots of >> container oriented features. >> Dave > > There’s also the very venerable (hence reliable) HTTP proxy/load balancer, Apache Traffic Manager, https://trafficserver.apache.org Thanks for the suggestions - unfortunately both of those (unless I misread them) terminate the TCP connection and make a new one to the backends. I was after something where I can see the original IP address on the socket. Though I could put a procy in front and add the headers I suppse, but thats a biut more work as it involves changing the code. Interested in the apache traffic manager - I hadnt come across that one before, tahnks, -pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f276b83a-e57b-a9f5-9186-e2b5116f9962>