Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:08:19 -0400 From: "Sean Bryant" <bryants@gmail.com> To: "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody? Message-ID: <f6791cc60605030808x2356eef5l42497a611b642523@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0605030620h55c49545pc995f571e52c7269@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060502171813.GA7296@roadrunner.q.local> <790a9fff0605021216s6db35c26m465148b051af74d3@mail.gmail.com> <f6791cc60605021413q852c528x257393ebf5c39d1f@mail.gmail.com> <790a9fff0605030620h55c49545pc995f571e52c7269@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ndisgen fails for me on 6.1-RC1 and 6.1-RC2. Any ideas? On 5/3/06, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/2/06, Sean Bryant <bryants@gmail.com> wrote: > > ndisgen is broken on 6.1 RC1 if I remember correctly. > > ndisgen wasn't broken, wpa_supplicant was broken as it didn't > recognize the ndis interfaces. The fix has since been applied to > -CURRENT and MFC'd to the RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_1 branches. > > Scot > > > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. > -- Sean Bryant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f6791cc60605030808x2356eef5l42497a611b642523>