Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:43:09 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel panic on PowerEdge 1950 under certain stress load Message-ID: <fdavot$eic$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <46F8D12E.7060202@FreeBSD.org> References: <c53be070709211526j2178ebb7ia6ea39e1a5df303c@mail.gmail.com> <fd84qf$ejl$1@sea.gmane.org> <c53be070709240842h6875d45ct761d0fa5790f70e2@mail.gmail.com> <46F8D12E.7060202@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Kris Kennaway wrote: > Does it really? i.e. did you compare the function names in detail and > find that they match precisely, or do you just mean "they are both > panics of some description and I dunno what it all means"? :) I ask > because the linked trace does not involve a spinlock, which means it > cannot be precisely the same trace. Isn't spinning and waiting "adaptive"? (AFAIK some locks spin for a short while before they wait). At least, that's why I thought they might be the same problem. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG+QJdldnAQVacBcgRAxgsAJ9hH+MtE+RuOOng5ryMcuE8RLqKigCgnK1g wwvIezHzeSTZewZxc+z/3M8= =65wF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fdavot$eic$1>