Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:47:25 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Centralized DB of "system" users Message-ID: <ghtq19$o1f$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <139b44430812120527w7b22d8a1m860cbf308e4b67c3@mail.gmail.com> References: <139b44430812112348k5c51072ie771913c982f7cfe@mail.gmail.com> <49422A05.6050907@gmail.com> <ghtdp3$g0r$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081212120557.V3687@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <9bbcef730812120426t3c4b8a28q337c8379cd947702@mail.gmail.com> <20081212141156.E4001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <139b44430812120527w7b22d8a1m860cbf308e4b67c3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Valentin Bud wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Wojciech Puchar < > wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > >> this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first >>>> why it is "right" solution? >>>> >>> Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X. >>> >> so not "right" but interoperable. if i do have only unix systems in LAN, >> NIS is much better easier and faster. > > > If you only have UNIX systems in LAN. But in my case i have Linux + FreeBSD > (server). From the handbook > NIS only works between FBSDs. Am i missing something? You are correct. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJQmttldnAQVacBcgRAjQAAJ97IVRooV1HkTkh3d147bm9HsEVHwCfdLuP W3s82NfL/CU1Zg3OITYbxp0= =b4tE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ghtq19$o1f$1>