Date: 25 Sep 2001 18:13:57 -0700 From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Chris <chris@chrisland.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 127/8 continued Message-ID: <j2lmj2vjmy.mj2@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <3BB0A0A2.6CCC454B@chrisland.net> References: <20010924094048.X5906-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> <3BB0A0A2.6CCC454B@chrisland.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Chris <chris@chrisland.net> writes: > Isn't that when we configure an IP on an interface, it will > automatically create a route for the corresponding "connected" network? Which seems more like a bug than a feature to me. Been giving me all kinds of grief. Even doing "ifconfig if# up" creates a unwanted network route which I then have to delete so packets will go to my gateway instead of out the interface as if there was no gateway. It seems to be designed on the assumption that we have sufficiently large number of IP addresses to waste a lot of them on subnets. I'd think that ifconfig (or is it the kernel) would at least have auto-routing optional. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?j2lmj2vjmy.mj2>