Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:11:56 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas Message-ID: <j3ju8s$kuo$2@dough.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <j38lj5$s9a$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAMBSHm_Sv_KZUs4h-tDGAZCq8s2qo_bMmfZxLbVkcH1=_Wu0OQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF-QHFW=aU3=iKE9WMg6%2BD6eP9OXth=c0AidBc140ykmAPD2zg@mail.gmail.com> <201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29.8.2011. 20:15, John Baldwin wrote: > However, the SRAT code just ignores the table when it encounters an issue like > this, it doesn't hang. Something else later in the boot must have hung. Anyway... that machine can in its maximal configuration be populated with eight 10-core CPUs, i.e. 80 physical / 160 logical, so here's a vote from me to bump the shiny new cpuset infrastructure maximum CPU count to 256 before 9.0. http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/5U/5086/SYS-5086B-TRF.cfm
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?j3ju8s$kuo$2>