Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:29:51 -0800 From: Mark Atkinson <atkin901@gmail.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP Message-ID: <kchhhs$bmp$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <1357611958.66651.YahooMailClassic@web121603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1357611958.66651.YahooMailClassic@web121603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/07/2013 18:25, Barney Cordoba wrote: > I have a situation where I have to run 9.1 on an old single core > box. Does anyone have a handle on whether it's better to build a > non SMP kernel or to just use a standard SMP build with just the > one core? Thanks. You can build a SMP kernel, but you'll get better performance (in my experience) with SCHED_4BSD on single cpu than with ULE. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDsSX8ACgkQrDN5kXnx8yYntACgophmypAll5NMMjsW3GRnkloY v6wAn0cPS9+/4xZyGCZ35Ttn4lK4b0t1 =Rlxm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?kchhhs$bmp$1>