Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:57:08 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with two interfaces on the same subnet? Message-ID: <kfdvph$92n$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ75GZwYwxuuXotqsfothz2cShbaD9yZQ9Gs5p%2BYbvA7Mw@mail.gmail.com> References: <kfduar$qrh$1@ger.gmane.org> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70995D@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <kfdvck$6ak$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAOjFWZ75GZwYwxuuXotqsfothz2cShbaD9yZQ9Gs5p%2BYbvA7Mw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 12/02/2013 18:52, Freddie Cash wrote: > Any reason you can't just use lagg(4) in one of the non-LACP modes? That's > bascially designed to do exactly what you want. No particular reason, I'm just not familiar enough with it. Will e.g. the "loadbalance" mode "just work" ? Should I expect any problems? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlEagnQACgkQ/QjVBj3/HSxc+wCgj6BYainu6CuUR37afOpAlICg LMAAn38OLLKDuc7qXM5c0oVBe6WFd2oC =R7gz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?kfdvph$92n$1>