Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 14:53:24 +0200 From: Christos Margiolis <christos@freebsd.org> To: Trenton Schulz <trueos@norwegianrockcat.com> Cc: freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Call for testing] New utility: audio(8) Message-ID: <kwct5gunxad5k56cmyjpa5oau5eaj6r37oesjioohwngzqqgbs@etyhtil4cwde> In-Reply-To: <3dbb48a0a6f4796d2319efd63585b1ef74f72075.camel@norwegianrockcat.com> References: <yogqbepd7uznm6bg5zohczynq55l3yotv7u54k5bwwr3kv3el3@cezkkxhzlpxz> <fi4tq6ouw7tteprpufprjw3eqts2vfa3o37hojt6miwiop32el@zbun6fzd7c2s> <3dbb48a0a6f4796d2319efd63585b1ef74f72075.camel@norwegianrockcat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Trenton Schulz wrote: > On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 14:04 +0200, Christos Margiolis wrote: > > Opinions on the name? Is better to keep it as audio(8) or rename it > > to > > sndctl(8)? > > What about taking inspiration from ifconfig and doing something like > soundconfig (or audioconfig or sndconfig)? > > Otherwise, as a utility name, audio doesn't really have any "action" > involved, so something like "control" or "config" is probably a move > towards a better name. I renamed it to sndctl(8). Christos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?kwct5gunxad5k56cmyjpa5oau5eaj6r37oesjioohwngzqqgbs>