Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 12:14:01 -0600 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version Resolution? Message-ID: <l03110700b098d91b8346@[208.2.87.4]> In-Reply-To: <199711191630.JAA04895@mt.sri.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971118195904.12391A-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu> <Pine.BSF.3.96.971118195904.12391A-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:30 AM -0600 11/19/97, Nate Williams wrote:
>> Did the question of how to identify versions (or revisions or
>> whatever) get resolved?
>>
>> Looking at /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh, it looks as if what I'm
>> going to get if I build a new kernel is 2.2.5-STABLE, without
>> any identifying date ("sources as of") of the type that was
>> discussed here earlier.
>
>Richard Wackerbath came up with a solution to it, but he fell off the
>face of the earth before it got completed. ;(
No. After I did the initial implementation to a specification that you
considered acceptable, you insisted that I add additional features.
However, these features are not presently needed for the master FreeBSD
archive. They would certainly be an improvement which I would consider
attempt to add in a future revision.
Rather than attempt to meet a "moving target" before ANY of my work
is allowed in, I prefer to spend my limited time working within other
projects where the methodology is specification driven.
As I have complained before, there really is a double standard applied
to participation.
Richard Wackerbarth
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03110700b098d91b8346>