Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 16:53:56 -0800 From: Bill Trost <trost@cloud.rain.com> To: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problems with SVEC NE2000 clone Message-ID: <m0xuoWR-0002WOC@jli.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 21 Jan 1998 09:35:01 %2B0900. <199801210035.JAA17564@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp> References: <199801210035.JAA17564@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
HOSOKAWA Tatsumi writes:
In article <m0xuo2I-0002WOC@jli.com>
trost@cloud.rain.com writes:
>> card "PMX " "PE-200"
>> config 0x1b "ed0" 10
config 0x1 "ed0"
No joy, even with the irq present. It was one that I had tried. It seems like
0x1 "should" be the right config entry. I don't understand....
>> ether 0xff0
ether 0x7f0
Why did you recommend this? It doesn't seem to make any difference, but I was
wondering why you suggested the change.
Thanks for the suggestions.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0xuoWR-0002WOC>