Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:48:26 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.ORG>, FreeBSD-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: msmith@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adding SO_NOSIGPIPE to -STABLE/-CURRENT Message-ID: <p05111775b92f06977bcb@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20020614022304.94570.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> References: <20020614022304.94570.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:22 PM -0300 6/13/02, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > Similar options can be found in: > > - Darwin - SOF_NOSIGPIPE > - Linux - MSG_NOSIGNAL > - Solaris - Don't recall > - Possibly others After a very quick check of include files on solaris, nothing obvious jumps out at me... How is the proposed SO_NOSIGPIPE different from SOF_NOSIGPIPE or MSG_NOSIGNAL? If the behavior is meant to be exact the same as one of those, then should we pick the same name? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05111775b92f06977bcb>