Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 08:04:43 -0500 From: Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: www/en/news/status spelling fix patch Message-ID: <p06000b08baa35a2bdcf8@[66.92.104.201]> In-Reply-To: <20030323.192437.59665844.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> References: <20030323.192437.59665844.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 7:24 PM +0900 2003/03/23, Hiroki Sato wrote: > I am not a native English speaker, so could someone review this? > I think I will commit in a couple of days if no objection. Hiroaki, It looks mostly right to me, but I found a few problems. >Index: report-august-2001.xml >@@ -1316,7 +1318,7 @@ > naturally resulted in a number of bugs being found. Development > work has mostly focused on fixing these problems and the project > is now set to release fourth patchset over the weekend, which >- should see the JDK in a reasonable useable state. One of the big >+ should see the JDK in a reasonable usable state. One of the big I think it should actually be "reasonably". > challenges left is producing a working HotSpot JVM, which looks > like it will require some heavy hacking.</p> > >Index: report-dec-2001-jan-2002.xml > <p>Milestone 4 will be to allow threads from the same program to >- run on multiple CPUS but may require more input from the SMPNG >+ run on multiple CPUS but may require more input from the SMPng If you're fixing capitalization, it should be CPUs. > project. I am at the moment (Feb 6) getting ready to commit a > first set of changes for milestone 3, that have no real effect > but serve to drastically reduce the complexity of the remaining >@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ > <p>The FreeBSD in Bulgarian project aims to bring a more > comfortable working environment to Bulgarian users of the FreeBSD > OS. This includes, but is not limited to, font, keymap and locale >- support, translation of the FreeBSD documentation into Bulgarian, >+ support, translation of the FreeBSD documentation into Bulgarians, This was correct -- the language is singular -- so the change is bad. > local user groups and various forms of on-line help channels and > discussion forums to help Bulgarians adopt and use FreeBSD.</p> >Index: report-feb-2002-apr-2002.xml >@@ -225,8 +227,8 @@ > printf(1) utility was brought up to conformance with the 1992 > edition of POSIX.2, with further development planned.</p> > >- <p>On the header front, much progress has been made. Specically, >- infrastructure to control visiblity of components of a header, based >+ <p>On the header front, much progress has been made. Specially, >+ infrastructure to control visibility of components of a header, based I'm not sure what the change is, but it should be "Specifically,". > on the standard requested by an application, has been added to > <sys/cdefs.h>. Some work has been completed on renovating the > way types are defined. This has lead to the creation of >@@ -397,7 +399,7 @@ > <p>We now have a loadable mfsroot floppy. It contains just the > diskeditor (which is really a disk partitioner) which has been > enhanced and is probably in his final form. It's been geared in his final -> in its final >- towards making the newfs(1) and mount(1) step seperate dialogs, so >+ towards making the newfs(1) and mount(1) step separate dialogs, so "step separate dialogs, so reduced its complexity." -> "steps separate dialogs, to reduce their complexity." > it reduced its complexity. A basic fstab class has been > implemented to manipulate /etc/fstab and mountpoint. This might > find a use outside libh, by the way. Libh package format is still >Index: report-july-2001.xml >@@ -241,9 +244,9 @@ > systems. The format will be similar to other conferences, with 2 > days of technical sessions over the Saturday and Sunday.</p> > >- <p>We'll be finalising the schedule towards the end of the month >+ <p>We'll be finalizing the schedule towards the end of the month > and anybody who is interested in doing a talk should contact us >- asap. There are no restrictions on the use of talks, if it's been >+ ASAP. There are no restrictions on the use of talks, if it's been talks, -> talks; > done before we may still be interested in having it presented to > an European audience, and we make no claims to the talks so > speakers are free to present the talks again at other >@@ -689,7 +692,7 @@ > <body> > <p>The goal of this project is the implementation of ATM > signalling and other ATM protocols by means of the netgraph(4) >- framework. This should provide an easily extendable architecture >+ framework. This should provide an easily extendible architecture extendible isn't right -- extensible works, though. > for using ATM on FreeBSD. Currently the full UNI4.0 stack (except > for the LIJ capability) has been implemented, including ILMI and > a first version of the ATM Forum API for UNI. An implementation >Index: report-july-2002-aug-2002.xml I didn't get to the 2001 or earlier changes. Regards, Chris Pepper -- Chris Pepper: <http://www.reppep.com/~pepper/>; Rockefeller University: <http://www.rockefeller.edu/>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06000b08baa35a2bdcf8>