Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:29:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Review please: pfil FIRST/LAST Message-ID: <slrnftshvr.1dfj.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> References: <200803160005.45827.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Max Laier! On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:05:36 +0100; Max Laier wrote about 'Review please: pfil FIRST/LAST': > attached is a small diff to allow pfil(9) consumers to force a sticky=20 > position on the head/tail of the processing queue. This can be used to=20 > do traffic conditioning kind of tasks w/o disturbing the other filters. =20 > I will need this to implement carp(4) ip based load balancing. While=20 > here I also removed a few paragraphs in BUGS which are no longer true=20 > (since we are using rmlocks for pfil(9)). > I'd appreciate review of the logic in pfil_list_add - just to make sure I=20 > didn't botch it. Thanks. Could it be done a way which will allow user a simple configuration of filter plly ordering? E.g. to specify that order must alway be "ipfw, then pf". -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnftshvr.1dfj.vadim_nuclight>