Date: 03 Jun 2000 19:18:12 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers Makefile ports/archivers/macutil Makefile ports/archivers/macutil/files md5 ports/archivers/macutil/patches patch-aa ports/archivers/macutil/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <vqcog5irxy3.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Kris Kennaway's message of "Sat, 3 Jun 2000 02:26:25 -0700 (PDT)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006030225400.76536-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> * > Thanks, but ports that deal with binary formats of other operating * > systems should go in emulators, not archivers. (Incidentally, there * > already is a port called "macutils" there....) * * This emulates nothing, it extracts files from binhex archives, analogously * to all of the other ports in archivers :-) I'm not saying it emulates anything, but we already have a few ports in emulators that work with foreign archive formats and don't emulate anything either. If people want to move those to archivers as well, that's fine with me. All I want is consistency. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcog5irxy3.fsf>