Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:36:36 -0600 From: "John Mehr" <jcm@visi.com> To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? Message-ID: <web-12014638@mailback4.g2host.com> In-Reply-To: <web-10502111@mailback3.g2host.com> References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET> <20130125092723.GC79995@e-Gitt.NET> <web-11528524@mailback4.g2host.com> <1359320641-6493504.60501067.fr0RL3aYw027137@rs149.luxsci.com> <web-10418670@mailback3.g2host.com> <1359380582-6256705.77592125.fr0SDgrYH000991@rs149.luxsci.com> <web-10502111@mailback3.g2host.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello all, I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a fresh base/releng/8.3 tree using svnup (Subversion's svn takes approximately 12 minutes). Incremental updates, such as tracking one of the stable branches takes only 2-3 minutes. For anyone that wants to preview the port before it gets added to the ports tree (assuming I got the send-pr correct), the tarball is located at: http://jcm.dsl.visi.com/freebsd/svnup/svnup-0.5.tar.xz Please let me know if you find any issues.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?web-12014638>