Date: 17 Mar 1999 03:28:24 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Subject: Re: latest -current doesn't execute BSDI-binary bladeenc Message-ID: <xzp3e34luif.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "Daniel O'Connor"'s message of "Wed, 17 Mar 1999 11:36:32 %2B1030 (CST)" References: <XFMail.990317113632.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> writes: > On 17-Mar-99 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > The bug is on the web site, not in the kernel. David Greenman > > committed a patch to better support large memory configurations. > > Unfortunately, it seems this was not possible to achieve without > > breaking BSDI compatibility. > Would it be feasable to have an option to switch between the two? Probably. I was just about to investigate this possibility. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp3e34luif.fsf>