Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:21:26 +0100
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        Artem Ignatiev <timon@memphis.mephi.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: broken top stats
Message-ID:  <xzp8yi3zc7d.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <1079276960.918.14.camel@timon.nist> (Artem Ignatiev's message of "Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:09:20 %2B0300")
References:  <1079276960.918.14.camel@timon.nist>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Artem Ignatiev <timon@memphis.mephi.ru> writes:
> I've noticed that top now is now unreliable in measuring system
> performance.

top has never been and will never be a reliable tool for system
performance measurement.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp8yi3zc7d.fsf>