Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:47:58 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: per-device sysctls Message-ID: <xzp8yipk4gh.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <2324.1077824628@critter.freebsd.dk> (Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:43:48 %2B0100") References: <2324.1077824628@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes: > Dag-Erling =3D?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=3DF8rgrav?=3D writes: > > "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > > > That is a good reason to transitioning to this, so long as we can come > > > up with a good way to represent detached nodes. > > As long as they have a device_t, it should be a piece of cake. > Having a device_t is a property of having hardware, not of being a > device driver. I believe that by "detached nodes", Warner means hardware that does not have a driver. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp8yipk4gh.fsf>