Date: 13 Feb 2001 02:11:26 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, John Indra <john@office.naver.co.id>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Message-ID: <xzpd7cno08x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Peter Wemm's message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:05:36 -0800" References: <200102130105.f1D15aU56009@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> writes: > http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/stdio.diff3 Except that we bump to 500 instead of 6, and back to 5 before -RELEASE. When we've branched RELENG_5, if we need to bump libc's major in 6.0-CURRENT, we bump it to 600, then 601 etc. as many times as we want, and bump it down to 6 before 6.0-RELEASE. People tracking -CURRENT will end up with a handful of different libc versions, but they'll avoid the pains we're going through now, and people upgrading from RELENG_N to RELENG_N+1 will never see a libc major version increase of more than 1. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpd7cno08x.fsf>