Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      28 Apr 2002 20:32:54 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How much PAM is enough?
Message-ID:  <xzpg01fekrt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0204281051470.19542-100000@server2.highperformance.net>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0204281051470.19542-100000@server2.highperformance.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> writes:
> For example, there exists a module "pam_nologin".  Why would I want to use
> a PAM module when FreeBSD supports this natively?

Because pam_nologin *is* how FreeBSD supports /etc/nologin.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg01fekrt.fsf>