Date: 28 Apr 2002 20:32:54 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How much PAM is enough? Message-ID: <xzpg01fekrt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0204281051470.19542-100000@server2.highperformance.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0204281051470.19542-100000@server2.highperformance.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> writes: > For example, there exists a module "pam_nologin". Why would I want to use > a PAM module when FreeBSD supports this natively? Because pam_nologin *is* how FreeBSD supports /etc/nologin. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg01fekrt.fsf>