Date: 09 Dec 2000 23:09:51 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/linux/linprocfs linprocfs_misc.c Message-ID: <xzpg0jxqma8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Marcel Moolenaar's message of "Sat, 09 Dec 2000 13:41:24 -0800" References: <200012091325.eB9DPsN51281@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001209105657.B23013@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzplmtps5m9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20001209123033.A24013@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzpu28dqo9x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3A32A704.F5AFD02B@cup.hp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> writes: > Having linprocfs under sys/i386/linux has bothered me for some time now. > linprocfs only has normal module dependencies with the Linuxulator, but > is otherwise unrelated to the Linuxulator. It should have a directory of > it's own (sys/i386/linprocfs?). Alternatively, linprocfs could be part > of the Linuxulator and not be a module of it's own. Linprocfs is totally independent of the linuxulator, and doesn't need it to run. Ideally, once it becomes machine-independent (or at least runs on more platforms than just i386), it should move to /sys/compat/linprocfs. I'd rather *not* see it integrated into the linuxulator, as that would make it a *lot* more difficult for me to maintain (I'd have to kill any Linux binaries I have running every time I want to test a change) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg0jxqma8.fsf>