Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:42:38 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ? Message-ID: <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> (John Kennedy's message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:40 -0800") References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> <20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> writes: > There are *lots* of differences between 4.x, 5.x and current given some > distance in time separating them, but you're right that the ports are more > or less the same. there is no "more or less". there is only one ports tree, and a freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpisjdmwld.fsf>