Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 May 2003 09:12:32 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Subject:   Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8
Message-ID:  <xzpr86ib50f.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <20030528231134.GE23471@spc.org> (Bruce M. Simpson's message of "Thu, 29 May 2003 00:11:34 %2B0100")
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0305221020170.82473-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <200305232040.30367.wes@softweyr.com> <xzphe7fe0ct.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200305280808.43444.wes@softweyr.com> <20030528231134.GE23471@spc.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> writes:
> However, we're dealing with something a bit more stable in terms of
> code base, anyway. Having to commit a whole bunch of fixes for the
> sake of a compiler upgrade isn't acceptable. Sounds like the GCC
> guys have been bitten by the Linux bug.

May I remind you that K&R-style declarations have been deprecated for
the last 14 years?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpr86ib50f.fsf>