Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:09:42 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic with this morning's (~9am EDT, 15 jan 2004) sources. Message-ID: <xzpvfnbslix.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200401161458.34197.jhb@FreeBSD.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:59:02 -0500") References: <EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC0108D8@EBE1.gc.nat> <200401161458.34197.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: > DES, you need to actually run a system with WITNESS on to test > things. I did test the fdalloc code with WITNESS yesterday, and didn't get this. > You probably don't need to lock the new filedesc structure > while you are creating it until you've actually hooked it up to a > proc structure. Yes, I do. fdgrowtable() for instance asserts that the filedesc is locked. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpvfnbslix.fsf>