Date: 24 Apr 1998 10:36:15 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Cc: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer), kjc@csl.sony.co.jp, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bandwidth throttling etc. Message-ID: <xzpzphb4nwg.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Luigi Rizzo's message of "Fri, 24 Apr 1998 07:48:54 %2B0200 (MET DST)" References: <199804240548.HAA20491@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> writes: > right. as a matter of fact, the ipfw "rules" are really a program > so i wonder if it wouldn't be better to define a simple language > (bytecode ?) such that /sbin/ipfw compiles a "program" into bytecode > that is passed to the kernel ... Just a thought: BPF... -- Noone else has a .sig like this one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzphb4nwg.fsf>