Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)

2021/freebsd-questions/20210620.freebsd-questions

Messages: 68, sorted by subject
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:25:19 UTC 2023

home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Jun 18 Daniel Cervus              =?utf-8?B?UmU6IGNkY29udHJvbCB3b27igJl0IHBsYXk=?=
  2. Jun 17 Daniel Cervus              =?utf-8?B?Y2Rjb250cm9sIHdvbuKAmXQgcGxheQ==?=
  3. Jun 17 Steve O'Hara-Smith         Re: cdcontrol =?UTF-8?B?d29u4oCZdA==?= play
  4. Jun 14 Alex Ernst                 FreeBSD PPC64le QEMU
  5. Jun 13 tech-lists                 freebsd tftp server for hetrogenous diskless clients
  6. Jun 13 Daniel Feenberg             Re: freebsd tftp server for hetrogenous diskless clients
  7. Jun 14 tech-lists                  Re: freebsd tftp server for hetrogenous diskless clients
  8. Jun 14 Daniel Feenberg             Re: freebsd tftp server for hetrogenous diskless clients
  9. Jun 14 Paul Mather                Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 888, Issue 1
 10. Jun 15 Ronald F. Guilmette        Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 11. Jun 15 Paul Procacci               Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 12. Jun 15 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 13. Jun 15 Kurt Hackenberg             Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 14. Jun 15 Michael Schuster            Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 15. Jun 15 Kurt Hackenberg             Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 16. Jun 15 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 17. Jun 15 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 18. Jun 15 Steve O'Hara-Smith          Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 19. Jun 15 Steve O'Hara-Smith          Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 20. Jun 15 Kurt Hackenberg             Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?


21. Jun 15 Paul Procacci Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 22. Jun 15 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 23. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 24. Jun 16 Kurt Hackenberg Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 25. Jun 16 Kurt Hackenberg Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 26. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 27. Jun 16 John Levine Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 28. Jun 16 Paul Procacci Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 29. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 30. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 31. Jun 16 Steve O'Hara-Smith Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 32. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 33. Jun 16 Steve O'Hara-Smith Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 34. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 35. Jun 16 Arthur Chance Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 36. Jun 16 Doug Hardie Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 37. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 38. Jun 16 Kurt Hackenberg Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 39. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic? 40. Jun 17 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
41. Jun 13 Victor Sudakov Re: lang/php72 needed 42. Jun 13 Steve O'Hara-Smith Re: lang/php72 needed 43. Jun 13 Victor Sudakov Re: lang/php72 needed 44. Jun 13 Steve O'Hara-Smith Re: lang/php72 needed 45. Jun 14 Harlan Stenn mlmmj team 46. Jun 14 Thomas Mueller Re: mlmmj team 47. Jun 14 Graham Perrin Re: mlmmj team 48. Jun 14 Ronald F. Guilmette Periodic tasks are not nice 49. Jun 14 John Levine Re: Periodic tasks are not nice 50. Jun 14 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Periodic tasks are not nice 51. Jun 14 Norman Gray Re: Periodic tasks are not nice 52. Jun 13 Victor Sudakov pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se) 53. Jun 15 Victor Sudakov Re: pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se) 54. Jun 16 Jan Beich Re: pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se) 55. Jun 16 Jan Beich Re: pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se) 56. Jun 17 Victor Sudakov Re: pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se) 57. Jun 17 Victor Sudakov Re: pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se) 58. Jun 16 Jochen Neumeister Problem with i386 jails on poudriere 59. Jun 16 Jan Beich Re: Problem with i386 jails on poudriere 60. Jun 18 Graham Perrin Re: Safety harnesses
61. Jun 17 Graham Perrin Safety harnesses (was: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?) 62. Jun 17 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Safety harnesses (was: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?) 63. Jun 14 Edward Sanford Sutton, III Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h? 64. Jun 16 Kurt Hackenberg Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h? 65. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h? 66. Jun 16 Arthur Chance Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h? 67. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h? 68. Jun 17 Norman Gray Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h?


home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date