2020/freebsd-net/20201025.freebsd-net
Messages: 66, sorted by subject
|
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:11:39 UTC 2026
|
|
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
1. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 125845] [tcp] [patch] tcp_lro_rx() should make use of hardware IP cksum assistance when available 2. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 125845] [tcp] [patch] tcp_lro_rx() should make use of hardware IP cksum assistance when available 3. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 125845] [tcp] [patch] tcp_lro_rx() should make use of hardware IP cksum assistance when available 4. Oct 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 211106] [net][fib][loopback][route] loopback route added only to interface fib, even if net.add_addr_allfibs = 1 5. Oct 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 211106] [net][fib][loopback][route] loopback route added only to interface fib, even if net.add_addr_allfibs = 1 6. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 214558] [tcp] Improve descriptions for sysctl net.inet.tcp.keepinit 7. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 217214] [tcp] frequent panics in tcp_output/sbsndptr 8. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 219991] [tcp][PATCH] TCP process bogus packets with too large ACK 9. Oct 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 224218] [sctp] Kernel panic in SCTP/IpV6 server mode 10. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 234444] [tcp] cc_htcp + TCP_RFC7413 panic 11. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237720] [tcp] tcpip network stack seized for six hours after large high-throughput file transfer 12. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 238741] [tcp] RACK stack causes connections to hang 13. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 240416] [tcp] Windows scaling (net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1) does not start the TCP connection to some systems 14. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 240946] [tcp] Check for ipv6_zoneid in tcp_hc_lookup() alongside inc6_faddr 15. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 242492] [tcp] TCP fast open observability 16. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 17. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 18. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 19. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 20. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
21. Oct 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 22. Oct 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 23. Oct 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 24. Oct 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 25. Oct 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 26. Oct 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 27. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 28. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 29. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 30. Oct 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 31. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC 32. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250357] [tcp] RFC 5961 is not implemented completely 33. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250357] [tcp] RFC 5961 is not implemented completely 34. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250357] [tcp] RFC 5961 is not implemented completely 35. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250360] [tcp] connections should be closed if a same packet without FIN is received after FIN received 36. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250360] [tcp] connections should be closed if a same packet without FIN is received after FIN received 37. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250363] [tcp] data in syn_ack should be ignored 38. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250363] [tcp] data in syn_ack should be ignored 39. Oct 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250366] [tcp] The ioctl of socket fd should return -1 after listen to avoid misusing. 40. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250366] [tcp] The ioctl of socket fd should return -1 after listen to avoid misusing.
41. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250366] [tcp] The ioctl of socket fd should return -1 after listen to avoid misusing. 42. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250436] Regression in 12.stable em driver 43. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250499] [tcp] Should we reject the packet with timestamp if no timestamp in SYN and SYN_ACK? 44. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250499] [tcp] Should we reject the packet with timestamp if no timestamp in SYN and SYN_ACK? 45. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250499] [tcp] Should we reject the packet with timestamp if no timestamp in SYN and SYN_ACK? 46. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250552] [net] [fib] dangling route table entry after destroying interface 47. Oct 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250552] [net] [fib] dangling route table entry after destroying interface 48. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 61744] [tcp] [patch] TCP hangs onto mbufs with no tcp data unnecessily under certain error conditions 49. Oct 24 Dewayne Geraghty Re: Allow PING(8) in jails without raw socket access permissions 50. Oct 23 Paul Thornton Getting netgraph stats 51. Oct 21 Andrea Venturoli Help with VNET 52. Oct 21 Goran Mekić Re: Help with VNET 53. Oct 21 Andrea Venturoli Re: Help with VNET 54. Oct 21 Andrea Venturoli Re: Help with VNET 55. Oct 21 Kristof Provost Re: Help with VNET 56. Oct 21 Patrick M. Hausen Re: Help with VNET 57. Oct 21 Kristof Provost Re: Help with VNET 58. Oct 21 Dheeraj Kandula Re: ims_merge in in_mcast.c 59. Oct 21 Ryan Stone Panic in in6_joingroup_locked 60. Oct 22 Alexander V. Chernikov Re: Panic in in6_joingroup_locked
61. Oct 22 Alexander V. Chernikov Re: Panic in in6_joingroup_locked 62. Oct 22 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: Panic in in6_joingroup_locked 63. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention 64. Oct 19 Shamsher Singh (sardarsi) Re: Query for KNI and user level tcp/ip stack support in FreeBSD ports 65. Oct 20 Miłosz Kaniewski safe_pause_us() is always at least 1 millisecond long 66. Oct 21 Ryan Stone Re: safe_pause_us() is always at least 1 millisecond long
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
