Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2021/freebsd-questions/20210620.freebsd-questions

Messages: 68, sorted by subject
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:15:33 UTC 2026

home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
  1. Jun 17 Daniel Cervus              cdcontrol won’t play
  2. Jun 17 Steve O'Hara-Smith          Re: cdcontrol won’t play
  3. Jun 18 Daniel Cervus               Re: cdcontrol won’t play
  4. Jun 14 Alex Ernst                 FreeBSD PPC64le QEMU
  5. Jun 13 tech-lists                 freebsd tftp server for hetrogenous diskless clients
  6. Jun 13 Daniel Feenberg             Re: freebsd tftp server for hetrogenous diskless clients
  7. Jun 14 tech-lists                  Re: freebsd tftp server for hetrogenous diskless clients
  8. Jun 14 Daniel Feenberg             Re: freebsd tftp server for hetrogenous diskless clients
  9. Jun 14 Paul Mather                Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 888, Issue 1
 10. Jun 15 Ronald F. Guilmette        Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 11. Jun 15 Paul Procacci               Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 12. Jun 15 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 13. Jun 15 Kurt Hackenberg             Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 14. Jun 15 Michael Schuster            Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 15. Jun 15 Kurt Hackenberg             Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 16. Jun 15 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 17. Jun 15 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 18. Jun 15 Steve O'Hara-Smith          Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 19. Jun 15 Steve O'Hara-Smith          Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 20. Jun 15 Kurt Hackenberg             Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?

 21. Jun 15 Paul Procacci               Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 22. Jun 15 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 23. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 24. Jun 16 Kurt Hackenberg             Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 25. Jun 16 Kurt Hackenberg             Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 26. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 27. Jun 16 John Levine                 Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 28. Jun 16 Paul Procacci               Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 29. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 30. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 31. Jun 16 Steve O'Hara-Smith          Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 32. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 33. Jun 16 Steve O'Hara-Smith          Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 34. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 35. Jun 16 Arthur Chance               Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 36. Jun 16 Doug Hardie                 Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 37. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 38. Jun 16 Kurt Hackenberg             Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 39. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?
 40. Jun 17 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?

 41. Jun 13 Victor Sudakov             Re: lang/php72 needed
 42. Jun 13 Steve O'Hara-Smith          Re: lang/php72 needed
 43. Jun 13 Victor Sudakov              Re: lang/php72 needed
 44. Jun 13 Steve O'Hara-Smith          Re: lang/php72 needed
 45. Jun 14 Harlan Stenn               mlmmj team
 46. Jun 14 Thomas Mueller              Re: mlmmj team
 47. Jun 14 Graham Perrin               Re: mlmmj team
 48. Jun 14 Ronald F. Guilmette        Periodic tasks are not nice
 49. Jun 14 John Levine                 Re: Periodic tasks are not nice
 50. Jun 14 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Periodic tasks are not nice
 51. Jun 14 Norman Gray                 Re: Periodic tasks are not nice
 52. Jun 13 Victor Sudakov             pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se)
 53. Jun 15 Victor Sudakov              Re: pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se)
 54. Jun 16 Jan Beich                   Re: pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se)
 55. Jun 16 Jan Beich                   Re: pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se)
 56. Jun 17 Victor Sudakov              Re: pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se)
 57. Jun 17 Victor Sudakov              Re: pourdiere broken for i386 jails ? (or maybe not poudriere per se)
 58. Jun 16 Jochen Neumeister          Problem with i386 jails on poudriere
 59. Jun 16 Jan Beich                   Re: Problem with i386 jails on poudriere
 60. Jun 18 Graham Perrin              Re: Safety harnesses

 61. Jun 17 Graham Perrin              Safety harnesses (was: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?)
 62. Jun 17 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Safety harnesses (was: Is a successful call to write(2) atomic?)
 63. Jun 14 Edward Sanford Sutton, III Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h?
 64. Jun 16 Kurt Hackenberg             Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h?
 65. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h?
 66. Jun 16 Arthur Chance               Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h?
 67. Jun 16 Ronald F. Guilmette         Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h?
 68. Jun 17 Norman Gray                 Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h?

home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date