Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 17:15:33 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Cc: scrappy@hub.org, ejs@bfd.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <199703022215.RAA00851@crh.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <199703022214.OAA07053@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Mar 2, 97 02:14:25 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >From The Desk Of The Hermit Hacker : > > On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Eric J. Schwertfeger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > > > > Now if we can convince bror@sms.fi to overclock his dual pentium and get > him > > > > the new client we may be able to beat the dual 400mhz alpha 8) > > > > > > If you check the stats page, you'll notice he just changed his listing > > > from 606k keys/sec to 676k keys/sec, so he has the updated binary. The > > > wonders of mime attachments :-) > > > > > > > Where can one get this updated binary? > > > > > > ftp://rah.star-gate.com/pub/rc5-56-client.gz > > Have at it 8) Its interesting to see a factually "ancient" binary being called the updated one :) -Crh Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703022215.RAA00851>